Skip to main content
June 9, 2026Anthropic Launches Claude Fable 5 with Runtime Fallback Safeguards and Mandat...

RESEARCH

Governance frameworks built from deployment.

The frameworks here come from AI deployment inside regulated federal environments. Each one addresses a gap that became visible during real deployment, not in theory. An agent can be configured, logged, and reviewed, and still have no written record showing who authorized it, what it was supposed to accomplish, or who is accountable when it produces a harmful output. This research addresses that gap directly. Every framework and every brief here is built from named primary sources. No product agenda. No consulting pitch.

Attribution

Sougata Roy | sougataroy.com | Views are my own

WHITE PAPERS

1 paper

Long-form research for governance decisions

01

White Paper

Who Owns the Agent?

The Organizational Accountability Architecture That Existing Governance Frameworks Require But Do Not Implement at the Agent Level

A framework white paper for CISOs, CTOs, security architects, and board members. The Intent Architecture Stack gives the accountability requirement in NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and the CSA Agentic Profile its organizational form at the individual agent level, before deployment, not after an incident.

v1.0 · May 2026 · 10 sections · Full diagnostic included

Frameworks

Nine operational frameworks

Nine operational frameworks built from AI deployment inside regulated federal environments. Each one produces a governance artifact an examiner can inspect.

Explore frameworks

The Governance Gap - weekly newsletter

Research delivered every Tuesday.

Primary-source research on AI governance developments, filtered for regulated environments and written from deployment practice.

Read the newsletter